What is the difference between the Narrative Fallacy and the Post …
2019年10月23日 · For Post-Hoc Rationalization, let us refer to Malcolm Gladwell's Blink which tackles the notion of intuition's relation to reasoning. His concept of "thin slices" is the idea that one can on very little information using a hunch construct and argument to defends one's position after an event occurs to explain it which is an act of abduction .
Difference between non-sequitur fallacy and post hoc fallacy?
2020年11月28日 · The post hoc fallacy is an informal fallacy; while it may represent faulty reasoning in some way, it does not actually constitute a formally, logically invalid argument. "Post hoc ergo propter hoc" assumes that because one event followed another, it must have been caused by it. This may or may not be the case; some things appear to be caused by ...
Is "if A then B; B therefore A" a subset of the "post hoc" fallacy?
Yes, the quoted argument is fallacious, but not due to post hoc ergo propter hoc; rather, it is affirming the consequent. The canonical fallacy is: If A, then B. B. Therefore, A. In this case, that translates to: If one is doing something useful, one will piss people off. I am pissing people off. Therefore, I am doing something useful.
logic - Post hoc fallacy Vs. Slippery slope fallacy - Philosophy Stack ...
2020年3月15日 · In post hoc ergo propter hoc that the "consequence" follows the "cause" is not in question, only that they are causally related is, as opposed to having a common cause or being coincidental. In contrast, in the slippery slope it is not in question that something can be a causal link in a chain leading to unintended consequences, only that the ...
fallacies - Is this a 'Post hoc ergo propter hoc' Fallacy?
2021年1月22日 · Post hoc ergo propter hoc would more likely be something with no obvious causation link, like "I won the lottery right after dumping my girl friend, ergo she must have been giving me bad luck all this time". –
What's so fallacious about the Slippery Slope Fallacy?
2012年10月23日 · Take, for example, post hoc, propter hoc: while, indeed, in general it is not true that if an event follows another they are both related causally, noting a strong temporal correlation between events of one type and events of the other can provide very good evidence of the existence of a causal process.
causality - Influence of irrelevant details on science - Philosophy ...
2024年10月19日 · Fallacy Avoidance: Rejecting claims based on logical errors like post hoc reasoning. If someone claims that the laws of electromagnetism change when a particular ritual is performed before an experiment, this falls into the post hoc fallacy unless there is a demonstrable causal connection.
fallacies - Is butterfly effect always happening? - Philosophy Stack ...
2022年10月15日 · This question simmilar like post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy except my question is contain negation. So this makes me wonder if butterfly effect always happening. fallacies
Logical Fallacy for implied causality? - Philosophy Stack Exchange
2017年1月6日 · It sounds like a post hoc fallacy however he never explicitly states the causality. I challenged his statement claiming it as a post hoc fallacy and he argued that it is not because he never explicitly stated that causality was for certain, and likewise I cannot prove that causality DOES NOT exist.
logic - Cause-effect fallacy - Philosophy Stack Exchange
2023年1月22日 · There are a few fallacies involving cause and effect. The examples given in the question are not cases of confusing cause with correlation (post hoc ergo propter hoc). There is the fallacy of confusing cause with effect (e.g. the umbrella and rain example).